And here’s the answer, plus a bit of a scandal


Earlier in the week I wondered what readers might make of this piece of public art, aka the ‘Shrewsbury Slinky’. Many of you picked up on the dinosaur bones, and the allusion to the double helix of DNA, both of which, we are told on the accompanying notice board, did indeed inform the thinking of the architectural designers, Pearce & Lal who conceived the structure. Some of you also guessed, or knew about the Charles Darwin connection.

Anyway, the work is called Quantum Leap, and as the explanatory board also states : “this geo-tectonic piece of sculpture has been designed through the influence of objects and materials central to the development of Darwin’s thought: rock, fossils, zoology…”

It was commissioned originally by Shrewsbury & Atcham Borough Council to commemorate the bicentenary of Darwin’s birth in 1809, and to mark the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species , both events well worth celebrating. The original cost to the public was expected to be around £200,000. But somehow, between the concept and its physical manifestation, things went awry on the costing front. More of which in a moment.

First, though, here is the man himself, sitting in his armchair outside the old Shrewsbury School, where as a youth he was student boarder. This more traditional tribute in bronze was unveiled in 1897:


Here you can see the 1897 unveiling. By then the prestigious Shrewsbury School had moved to larger premises across the River Severn, and Darwin’s old school become the town museum and reference library. This photograph is from the Shropshire Museums collection.


I don’t suppose many know that Charles Darwin was a Shropshire lad, born and brought up in Shrewsbury. If we picture him anywhere at all it is probably voyaging around the world on HMS Beagle (1831-1836), surrounded by a myriad of fascinating specimens, or else lost in deepest thought, unpicking thorny issues on his Thinking Path at Down House, Kent where he lived with his family for the last forty years of his life.

The Darwin family lived on The Mount in Shrewsbury. Darwin’s father was a doctor and financier, and also a free thinker. Charles’ paternal grandfather was Erasmus Darwin, physician, natural philosopher, inventor and leading light of the Midlands Enlightenment. His maternal grandfather was Josiah Wedgwood, potter industrialist extraordinaire, and inventor. Both grandfathers were staunch slave trade abolitionists. Darwin thus grew up within the orbit of men for whom it was the norm to challenge and think outside the bounds of convention.

While his mother still lived, Charles and his siblings worshipped at Shrewsbury’s Unitarian Chapel. Charles also went to the preacher’s day school, and by an early age was already absorbed with his own natural history collections. But after Susannah Darwin’s death, Charles and his brother, Erasmus were sent off to board at Shrewsbury School. Later both would go to Edinburgh to study medicine, and Charles apparently spent the year of 1825 acting as apprentice to his father, and treating the poor people of Shropshire.

However, he found medicine dull, and seems to have spent his time in Edinburgh studying marine invertebrates and learning taxidermy from a freed slave called John Edmonstone, a man whose company he much enjoyed. An annoyed parent wisely chose not to press his son into the family profession, but sent him to Christ’s College Cambridge; he would get his degree and become an Anglican minister instead.

But once more Doctor Darwin’s plans for his son foundered. While at Cambridge, Charles continued to pursue his interest in natural history. When he graduated in 1831 he took the chance to embark on a ‘gap year’ to end all gap years, and set sail on HMS Beagle, travelling as the ship’s gentleman naturalist. The planned two year voyage turned into five. The rest, as they say, is history.


And so back to Quantum Leap, a project that was indubitably inspired by the very best of intentions – to honour the life’s work of a native son. I’ve already mentioned the unsuitable setting, in a cramped little garden between the River Severn and the town’s busy inner ring road. It is not a part of the town where many visitors are likely to find themselves, or even wish to be. But perhaps my main objection is the material. Concrete seems such a rigidly dull substance with which to evoke structures from the natural world. I can also foresee it acquiring a slimy algal coat, which though admittedly a life form, is unlikely to add a life-enhancing effect from the viewer’s point of view. And given all the cuts in Local Authority funding, it seems unlikely that someone will be paid to come along and scrub the thing. Where would you begin?

I’m trying to think, too, what that magician of installation, Anish Kapoor, could do for it, if called on to do some remedial work. I’m imagining something in cast iron here, or in wrought iron, or polished steel. Or even wood. Or perhaps, as Marilyn Armstrong suggests in the comments on So what’s this all about?, people will just hate it so much it will be taken down. My own feeling is that it will simply be forgotten, and that is the worst outcome of all. So much for commemoration.

This brings me to the most shocking aspect of the project. As we headed into the unveiling year of 2009, Shropshire was becoming a Unitary Authority, and the Borough Council passing into obscurity. There followed various problems with the contractors assigned to construct the monument. Costs rocketed. There was a court case. According to press reports there was a chance for the Council to settle the bill when it hit £600,000. They declined. In the end the 2012 accounts revealed that the final cost had amounted to over £1,000,000. As one Labour councillor acidly pointed out, this was considerably more than the cost of Antony Gormley’s epic, acclaimed and truly colossal Gateshead landmark,  Angel of the North.

However you look at it, the final bill is staggering. In the face of austerity measures that have reduced some Shropshire residents to relying on Food Banks, and threatened so many social services, it is appalling to think of so much wasted money. But money aside, the whole enterprise now seems rather sad and silly. The original design concept for Quantum Leap has much to be said for it, but when it comes down to it, public art should serve the public who paid for it. It should be placed where everyone can enjoy it. It should be life-enhancing, spirit-raising, thought-provoking, a piece of wit or wisdom that becomes a point of attraction for locals and visitors alike. In other words, there should be returns on the investment, material and immaterial. It doesn’t of course mean that everyone has to like it. That would be too much to ask.

My other thought is that the town already has its monument to Charles Darwin. They got it right back in 1897. And although the statue might these days seem unadventurous, not to say a bit stuffy, it does at least show us the man – his intelligence, modesty and humanity – qualities that cannot be too highly valued. Not even the town’s incontinent pigeons detract from them. And so christened with bird lime he may be, but Charles Darwin looks a pretty decent old gent. His thinking changed the way we think. It took on superstition, and narrow-mindedness, and continues to challenge the scientific world to explore ever new ways to understand life on the planet. We Salopians can feel justly proud that he is one of ours.

copyright 2015 Tish Farrell


This is a follow up on my post for Paula’s Black & White Sunday theme of sculpture:  So What’s This All About?

24 thoughts on “And here’s the answer, plus a bit of a scandal

  1. Hmm…perhaps the money would have been better spent on scholarships for the next generation of scientists and thinkers. I wonder what Darwin would have made of this monument. Your post is a great Thinking Path. 😉

    1. Oh that’s so nice of you – a thinking path post. And yes, scholarships, wouldn’t that have been a fine thing to do. According to the news this week it costs around £60,000 for a young person to get a degree these days.

      1. The costs of tertiary education are horrendous, even here. I know that I would not have a degree and neither would my husband if we had been obliged to pay for our university fees.

      2. Yes I had a grant too. I really don’t understand why the same can’t be done today. It completely bamboozles me how the simplicity of the old system could be more costly than the bureaucracy and paper shuffling of the present system we have in NZ where students borrow from the Government to pay for fees and living costs, and end up with enormous debt.

  2. It’s so great of you to post a follow up, Tish. I am grateful for the information about Darwin that I didn’t know. I had no idea that he was from Shrewsbury. And you are absolutely right in saying that there should be returns on the investment. P.S. Your photo of Darwin sculpture is beautiful.

    1. Thank you, Paula. I’ve actually made myself quite cross writing about Quantum Leap. I feel Darwin’s ideas deserve something rather better memorial wise; something in the heart of town where everyone can see it. The public space around his statue outside the library could have been used instead, and in less grandiose, but more creative ways. Installations that change (evolve) perhaps.

      1. That’s a very interesting concept – evolving installations. I would be outraged with the cost of the whole thing; I would think that this ludicrous amount of money should serve the public in some real, palpable way, like investing in knowledge, education and future.

  3. I agree, “public art should serve the public” more especially this one with such high construction costs. Such a pity that this wonderful idea (never mind the concrete) to honour Darwin is not so accessible. But a very information post. I didn’t know that much about the man, except that he is the originator of the biological theory of evolution.

    BTW, I’m glad I finally find a familiar face. I launched my second blog two days ago and have been trying to track down my community but WordPress is such a maze:). So, thanks to because I found you on her site.

  4. Your posts are so dense, I have to read them a few times to enjoy all their facets. I never know quite where you’re going to take me: politics; great men; aesthetics; social concern. I very much liked this encounter with Mr Darwin, and your notion of his gap year made me laugh. I was deeply disappointed when I got to his account of Australia at the end of the Beagle’s voyage: he’d been so expansive about South America and the Galapagos, I was looking forward to seeing Australia through his eyes. But I reckon he was a bit fatigued by then.

    There were some great shots of the sculpture showing its potential: gleaming polished steel sounds like a good choice of material.I’ve just been looking at photos of Bert Flugelman’s “Cones” in the sculpture garden at the National Gallery of Australia: they inhabit spaciousness and pick up wonderful reflections. I can imagine the Slinky sited and material-ised thus. Concrete does not acquire that attractive patina of age.

    Thanks for a varied mind-journey on Friday morning!

  5. aside from the cost,the whole things just seems too big – ‘the wooly mammoth’ of the West Midlands does not have the same ring or accommodating space as ‘angel of the north’.
    Tish, this was a very interesting post – to read about Darwin and his quantum leap of a gap year

  6. I envy Darwin’s gap year, but it certainly was a year that created controversy and changed the thinking of the masses. I think they need you on their council Tish to instil some sense into their decisions.

    1. Oh the idea, Pauline! A few of us in Wenlock once had a lot problems with our town council not taking flooding, and planning issues seriously. We organised a town referendum. We even had a pressure group, Wenlock Eye, with website and newsletter. Despite being bored rigid, I used to sit in on all council meetings and take notes. One anarchic councillor told me later that this had a very intimidating effect on many councillors. I could have been writing shopping lists of course. It taught how very very hard it is to maintain a democracy in a climate where vested interest rules. So I’m afraid I retreated to my PC and allotment, and the Wenlock Eye is now firmly closed, or maybe just peeeking a bit 🙂

      1. I had to chuckle at the vision of you intimidating all the council bods with your list writing Tish. People power can have miraculous results but oh the time and toll it must take on the organisers. Over here people power has had some good results. Big business consortiums are trying to build a 6 star hotel and casino on “the spit” one of the last remaining wild places in the centre of the Gold Coast. Protest groups managed to stave it off and now at election time the “other side” promised not to go ahead with plans, and they surprisingly got in… So far they are sticking to their election promise. But the “others” are still lurking in the background…

  7. I prefer the older memorial sculpture… though I would be shy to say it in a crowd, because it’s so expected from an old man… He does look like a very friendly fellow.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.